慢半拍的老外終于開(kāi)始集體吐槽《爵跡》了……
作者:dlacus
來(lái)源:IMDb
2016-10-24 17:04
由郭小四執(zhí)導(dǎo)的真人CG奇幻片《爵跡》于9月30日在中國(guó)上映。
這部驚天地泣鬼神的奇幻巨制在6月預(yù)告片曝出之后,各界噴子和粉絲的掐架就如火如荼的持續(xù)了幾個(gè)月,動(dòng)畫(huà)網(wǎng)游傻傻分不清,未上映先火起,英語(yǔ)君只服郭敬明……
范冰冰、吳亦凡、陳學(xué)冬、陳偉霆、楊冪、郭采潔……就算你們湊了幾桌黃金麻將,就算傳說(shuō)中的《阿凡達(dá)》特效鎮(zhèn)樓,也救不了豆瓣超低評(píng)分3.7,更別說(shuō)票房也未達(dá)到投資者的預(yù)期……
下映的《爵跡》如今終于漂洋過(guò)海在老外觀影圈內(nèi)掀起吐槽狂潮了!不知道寫下這些長(zhǎng)評(píng)的老外內(nèi)心是多么澎(操)湃(蛋),但是每一篇評(píng)論都深深戳中了英語(yǔ)君的心窩……
到底老外看完《爵跡》是啥反應(yīng)?前方來(lái)自IMDb的影評(píng),各種高能預(yù)警——
看看第一條評(píng)論是怎么說(shuō)的:
complete and utter crap
完全在扯淡
I kept checking IMDb for reviews for this but lo and behold, none. So that makes mine the first review. Which also makes me the first sucker to review this on IMDb, despite advance negative press for this film. Firstly I'd like to let you know that I didn't spend good money on this film but my god what a turd crap it was. Where to begin? As can be seen from the trailers, it's overpaid and underwhelming Chinese super-stars dressed up from head to toe in CGI. I wasn't sure whether I was watching the next Final Fantasy installment, or why i was watching Final Fantasy on the big screen in 3D.
我不斷刷著IMDb網(wǎng)站上對(duì)這部電影的評(píng)論,但是,你瞧,一條都沒(méi)有。所以我的評(píng)論就成了第一條。這也使我成為在IMDb網(wǎng)站上評(píng)論這部電影的第一個(gè)受騙之人,我不在乎自己的評(píng)論會(huì)為這部電影帶來(lái)負(fù)面新聞。首先,我想讓你知道,看這部電影,我沒(méi)花多少錢,但是,額滴神呀,這都是些什么垃圾呀。從哪兒開(kāi)始說(shuō)呢?就像預(yù)告中的那樣,拿著高昂片酬卻沒(méi)有給觀眾留下深刻印象的中國(guó)超級(jí)明星用CGI特效從頭武裝到腳。我不確定自己是否在看下一部《最終幻想》,或者說(shuō),我不確定為什么自己在看3D大屏幕放映的《最終幻想》。
The 3D added nothing to the lack of story, and because the effects were so cheaply done (see my final fantasy metaphor), And the acting? What from these characterless, dull, Chinese stars who are too busy looking expressionless, and assuming Japanese manga-style poses? Let's just say that the CGI made it even worse ( if that's even possible ) I have absolutely no idea, how this film got made, but from one Chinese movie fan, to another, please, don't waste your time.
3D技術(shù)的應(yīng)用并沒(méi)有為故事添彩,因?yàn)槔锩娴奶匦畠r(jià)(看我用《最終幻想》打的比喻)。關(guān)于演技?從這些平凡又無(wú)趣的中國(guó)明星身上能看到的就是他們忙著面無(wú)表情地?cái)[出日本漫畫(huà)中的姿勢(shì)?我們只能說(shuō)CGI特效使電影變得更糟(如果這有可能的話)。我完全不知道這部電影是怎么制作出來(lái)的,但是,中國(guó)影迷們,請(qǐng)不要浪費(fèi)自己的時(shí)間啦。
這位來(lái)自華盛頓的網(wǎng)友作為一名忠實(shí)的原著粉還是比較冷·靜·的:
Muddled by Storytelling
被故事情節(jié)搞糊涂了
L.O.R.D. the movie is a pretty confusing situation. Whereas many stories in the action/fantasy category get tied down because of their lack of plot, L.O.R.D. has a great plot, but tells it poorly. There are actually a lot of things going for it, but in the end it's a bit of a muddled mess. For example, The acting was better than expected, especially with the amount of screen presence of Cheney Chen who I love to bits but has never been the strongest actor. The visuals are great (when the technology is working the way it should be). The general plot is interesting and creates a lot of room for character development and relationships.
《爵跡》這部電影的情節(jié)太混亂了。雖然許多動(dòng)作類/奇幻類的電影都被情節(jié)太少所拖累,但《爵跡》雖然情節(jié)不錯(cuò),但這部電影卻沒(méi)有把故事講好。事實(shí)上,電影中有許多內(nèi)容值得好好講一講,然而最終卻變得有點(diǎn)混亂。例如,演員的表演就比預(yù)期中的要好,特別是陳學(xué)冬的鏡頭,雖然他不是最棒的演員,但我還是非常喜歡他。這部電影的畫(huà)面非常棒(技術(shù)運(yùn)用的恰如其分)。情節(jié)整體上是蠻有趣的,而且為角色的個(gè)性發(fā)展以及關(guān)系的演變留有很大的空間。
The biggest issue is the way the story is told. There are many characters, and if you've read the books they are easy to identify, but if you haven't the movie will leave you confused about who hates who and why. The animation, though more advanced than most films, is really hard to watch sometimes, especially in the fight scenes. The English subtitles, are manageable but by no means palatable.
這部電影最大的問(wèn)題就是故事展開(kāi)的方式。電影中有許多角色,如果你看過(guò)小說(shuō),就很容易認(rèn)出他們;但是,你沒(méi)看過(guò)小說(shuō)的話,你就會(huì)對(duì)電影中“誰(shuí)恨誰(shuí),為什么” 困惑不已。雖然這部電影中的動(dòng)畫(huà)比多數(shù)電影都要先進(jìn),但是有時(shí)候卻難以觀看,特別是打斗的場(chǎng)景。英語(yǔ)副標(biāo)題可以用,但這里用的卻不太合適。
Despite all this I'm giving it at 7/10 because I did actually enjoy the movie as a reader of the books. I just feel bad for people who haven't.
雖然我給予了上述評(píng)價(jià),但我還是給這部電影打了7分,因?yàn)樽鳛樾≌f(shuō)讀者,我確實(shí)喜歡這部電影。我只是為那些沒(méi)看過(guò)小說(shuō)的觀眾感到遺憾。
Guo Jin Ming has muddled his books with sub-par direction and screen writing. If you've seen the movie and you like the premise of the story, I'd strongly recommend reading the book which you can find in English online. To find them translated you will probably have to look on fansites.
郭敬明用低水準(zhǔn)的導(dǎo)演水平、字幕處理技術(shù)把自己的小說(shuō)搞得一團(tuán)糟。如果你看過(guò)這部電影,并且喜歡這個(gè)故事的背景,我強(qiáng)烈建議你看看這部小說(shuō),你可以從網(wǎng)上找到這部小說(shuō)的英文版。要找到這部小說(shuō)的譯本,你可能得去郭敬明的粉絲網(wǎng)站上看看。
而這名來(lái)自印度尼西亞的網(wǎng)友顯然已經(jīng)出離憤怒了……
Total piece of crap.
一坨翔
You read my title, spend your money elsewhere. The movie story line is so convoluted, I got instant migraine just from watching it. The opening scene give some back ground about the fantasy land of the story, but that's about it. as the story progresses I keep asking myself, who is this character and why should I care about him? and as new character appears, the same questions repeat it self. Who is this new character and why should I care about it?
看我的標(biāo)題,不要把錢浪費(fèi)在這兒。這部電影的情節(jié)太復(fù)雜,我一看就頭疼。電影開(kāi)場(chǎng)簡(jiǎn)單介紹了故事中的夢(mèng)幻大陸,也就是故事背景,但就這么多了。隨著故事的發(fā)展,我不斷地問(wèn)自己,這個(gè)角色是誰(shuí),我為什么要在意他?當(dāng)新角色登場(chǎng)的時(shí)候,我又重復(fù)地問(wèn)著自己同樣的問(wèn)題。這個(gè)新角色是誰(shuí),我為什么要在意它?
And after 30 min I began to ask who is the protagonist who is the antagonist of the story? and as more characters with no background keep being added to the story. My interest in the movie just completely over. 1 hrs into the movie the only thing I get from the movie is there are bunch of guys and bunch of girls who meet and fight each other for I don't know what is the reason. What the hell am I watching? and the ending is a complete non ending. who won? who lose? So it's a bunch of guys who meet and fight and no one is winning and no one is losing?
看了30分鐘之后,我開(kāi)始問(wèn)自己,誰(shuí)是主角,誰(shuí)是這個(gè)故事中的反派?隨著更多沒(méi)什么背景介紹的角色不斷登場(chǎng),我對(duì)這部電影徹底失去了興趣。在這部電影一個(gè)小時(shí)的內(nèi)容里,我從中了解到的唯一一件事就是一群姑娘小伙彼此見(jiàn)了面,然后不知怎么的就打起來(lái)了。我到底在看啥?而且結(jié)局根本就不是一個(gè)完整的結(jié)局。誰(shuí)贏了?誰(shuí)輸了?所以這個(gè)故事就是一群小伙子見(jiàn)面打了一場(chǎng),沒(méi)有贏家也沒(méi)有輸家?
WHO WRITE this stuff? 3 year old baby? Whoever write this story need to go to school and stop bringing misery to movie viewer. Here is a basic story writing : Opening, Content, and Conclusion. and the 3 D animations, sure it capture the face of the movie star into 3 D CG, but they fail to capture any expression from their face, it's like watching a doll house. Even in death their face is expressionless.
這個(gè)故事是誰(shuí)寫的?三歲小孩?不管誰(shuí)寫的這個(gè)故事,他都需要重回學(xué)校學(xué)習(xí),不要再把這種痛苦帶給其他電影觀眾了?;镜墓适录軜?gòu)應(yīng)該是這樣的:開(kāi)場(chǎng)、內(nèi)容、結(jié)局。這部3D動(dòng)畫(huà),的確用3D CG特效捕捉了電影明星的面部,但是他們沒(méi)有處理好演員的面部表情,看起來(lái)就像玩偶之家一樣。甚至是瀕臨死亡的時(shí)候,他們的面部都沒(méi)什么表情。
Trust me your money is better spend watching other movie. I want my money back! too bad Chinese theater don't give refunds.
相信我,你還是花錢看別的電影吧。我想把錢要回來(lái)!中國(guó)影院太壞了,不給退錢。
你看過(guò)《爵跡》了?有沒(méi)有什么觀后感想和英語(yǔ)君聊聊的?
聲明:本內(nèi)容為滬江英語(yǔ)原創(chuàng)整理,轉(zhuǎn)載需征得同意后,注明出處【滬江英語(yǔ)】。