At last night’s MTV Movie & TV Award, Emma Watson won the first MTV Movie Award that didn't separate nominees based on gender. Asia Kate Dillon announced the winner and handed Emma her award.
在昨晚的MTV電影電視獎頒獎典禮上，艾瑪·沃特森贏得了第一個沒有按性別區(qū)分候選人的MTV電影獎。艾莎·凱特·迪倫宣布了優(yōu)勝者并為艾瑪頒了獎。

‘The first acting award in history that doesn’t separate nominees based on their sex says something about how we perceive the human experience,’ Emma said.
“歷史上第一個沒有按性別區(qū)分候選人的表演獎說明了我們是如何理解人類經(jīng)歷的，”艾瑪說道。

‘Acting is about the ability to put yourself into someone else’s shoes and that doesn’t have to be separated into two different categories,’ she declared in her speech.
“表演是關于自己站在他人立場上思考問題的能力，而這并不需要被分成兩種不同的類別，”她在發(fā)表（獲獎）感言的時候說道。

Emma told the MTV audience: ‘I’m so proud to be part of a film that celebrates diversity, literacy and love the way this one does.’
艾瑪告訴MTV音樂電視頻道的觀眾，“一部電影用自己的方式頌揚了多樣化、文化素養(yǎng)和愛情，我很自豪能成為這樣一部電影的一部分?！?/div>

But here’s the real problem with trying to create a gender-neutral competitive world: it will never work.
不過要嘗試創(chuàng)造一個不區(qū)分性別競爭的世界，現(xiàn)實問題就是：它行不通。

Let’s now imagine this idea is taken to the main acting awards season, featuring the Oscars, Emmys and Golden Globes?
現(xiàn)在讓我們想象一下把這個想法應用到重要的表演獎頒獎季，例如應用到奧斯卡獎、艾美獎以及金球獎的頒獎禮上？

First, there would be half as many awards, obviously. So half as many people would get recognised for their acting work as currently do.
首先，獎項的數(shù)量顯然會變成一半，也就是說（只有）一半的人會因其當前的表演作品而得到認可。

Second, what if by chance, men won the first five years of gender-neutral Best Actor awards simply because they genuinely happened to give better performances than the women in that period?
第二，在評選這個不按性別評定的獎項時，如果男性碰巧贏得了前五年的最佳演員獎將會怎么樣，只是因為在那段時間里他們真的比女演員的表演更出色嗎？

Can you picture the global outrage that would provoke? Rabid feminists would stamp their feet and scream that the only reason men were winning was… ‘SEXISM!’
你能想象這會在全球引起的憤怒嗎？偏激的女權主義者會跺著腳大喊，男性獲獎的唯一原因是……“性別歧視”！

（翻譯：Dlacus）

聲明：本雙語文章的中文翻譯系滬江英語原創(chuàng)內容，轉載請注明出處。中文翻譯僅代表譯者個人觀點，僅供參考。如有不妥之處，歡迎指正。